Nasdaq Index Blog - Posts with tag of "pensions"

The Spaulding Group Launches New Custodian Guidelines for Transparency in Benchmark Costs Updated: 12/16/2014

The Spaulding Group, the leading performance measurement service firm in the money management industry, today announced the launch of the “Custodian Guidelines for Transparency in Benchmark Cost” in partnership with BNY Mellon, State Street and Northern Trust. The “Guidelines” were developed with the goal to improve transparency on embedded fees for benchmark data, and enable investors to make informed decisions by understanding the details behind the fees they are paying.

“The ever-increasing cost of benchmark data has been an issue that has grown in importance every year. It has been a major theme of our Performance Measurement Forums, and a hot topic of discussion at our annual Performance Measurement, Attribution and Risk conferences and in our surveys,” said David Spaulding, Founder and CEO of The Spaulding Group.

The Spaulding Group worked closely with three participating custodian banks to create a set of principles that the industry should abide by in order to increase awareness of the costs associated with indexes. This list of best practices is designed to lead to further efficiencies in the asset management industry by ultimately lowering fees paid by end-clients, predominantly asset owners.

In conjunction with the adoption of the “Guidelines," Nasdaq has agreed to license its Nasdaq Global Index Family at no cost to custodian banks that abide by the guidelines set forth by The Spaulding Group and will be offered by BNY Mellon, State Street, and Northern Trust as a low-cost reporting option.

Banks can join by publicly acknowledging they will abide by the principles that have been outlined.

“As the industry examines the fees associated with benchmarks, Nasdaq is focused on providing low-cost indexes that span geographies and asset classes,” said John Jacobs, Executive Vice President, Global Information Services at Nasdaq. “We are excited to offer our Global Index Family to these custodian banks, as they work to increase transparency on the cost of index data. We applaud the work done by The Spaulding Group, BNY Mellon, State Street, and Northern Trust to bring this key issue to the forefront of the asset management industry.”

A whitepaper focused on benchmarks will appear in the Spring issue of The Journal of Performance Measurement, co-authored by The Spaulding Group, BNY Mellon, State Street and Northern Trust.

For more information on the Spaulding Group’s “Guidelines for Transparency in Benchmark Cost," and full transcript of the custodian bank interviews, click here. To be contacted by a member of our team, please click here.

Index Wars By: John Jacobs
on 1/16/2014

Index Wars: The effect of increased competition on ETF Providers, Pensions and other Institutional Investors. As long as investors continually look for new and better ways to invest in, track or beat the market, index providers will continually be challenged to find ways to create better, more robust benchmarks to meet customer expectations. The demand on index providers today is greater than it’s ever been. Top indexers are expected to do more and more, and as a result changes in the industry are necessary to respond to increased investor demands. This has greatly increased competition among indexers and that competition has had a direct effect on exchange-traded funds (ETFs) providers, pension funds and other institutional investors who are focused on passive investing.

Product Brand has More Power

In the past, almost anyone with a computer could create an index. They were relatively simple and didn’t require a lot of functionality. Today, however, index providers are expected to create, calculate and disseminate indexes rapidly with the ability to perform years of back-testing. Customers ranging from ETF providers to institutional investors are looking for full service indexers with sophisticated databases that have the capabilities and flexibility to respond to their growing needs.

Customer demands and priorities are shifting like we’ve never seen.  The index licensing cost component of total expense ratios has continued to decline in financial products over the last several years and ETF providers are increasingly willing to re-evaluate their current benchmarks in search for the best value available. In the early days of ETFs, the index was a key part of a buyer’s purchase decision. Companies such as S&P sold products and people bought ETFs based in large part to the overall brand of the index provider. 

While having a strong index brand is still important to investors, more and more investors are instead focusing on the brand of the product provider (e.g., Vanguard, PowerShares, etc.). Today, the top three ETF/ETP providers – IShares, SPDR ETFs and Vanguard – account for 69.6% of Global ETF/ETP assets, while the remaining providers each have less than 4% market share.1

Since the brand of the index provider is now only a part of what drives the investment decision, ETP providers have the flexibility to choose among multiple index providers offering nearly identical benchmarks. The increased competition is driving down costs, thus reducing expense ratios. Sophisticated index investors are getting smarter and more willing to look at a broader array of offerings as ETF providers share these cost saving measures with their customers.

Indexes are Becoming Commoditized

With increased competition comes the natural commoditization of products and certain index segments. Global equities are a great example. Twenty years ago, it was actually quite complicated to find a global equities ETP product; however, it is much easier today because every major indexer offers a very similar suite of benchmarks. In the same way, the market has come to expect a consistent set of standards for representing different market sectors so the diversions among index providers are much narrower than they used to be. Twenty years ago, the differences between the offerings of the various index providers were fairly wide. Today, the differences are minimal, making it easier to step from one provider to another, and ultimately reducing the cost of the product. 

Of course there are certain exceptions where index providers differentiate themselves. There are some flagship indexes such as the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ-100 where commoditization has not taken hold. There are also niche indexes, such as a sector family or specific industry-focused indexes like the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (NBI), where a few indexers have a distinct foothold on the industry.

Pension Consultants Influence: Beyond Asset Allocation

Much of the focus on fees is thought to be on the shoulders of ETF providers, but they are only part of the ecosystem. Pension consultants, who recommend specific benchmarks to their clients, are also starting to weigh in on index licensing costs.  Up until recently, consultants were not as cognizant of how much the people downstream were paying for data. For the asset owners and their managers, this was a hidden cost.  Now, they are realizing that this data cost is a factor in overall investment performance.  Previously, consultants’ primary focus was on their clients’ asset allocation, risk tolerance and risk profile. More often than not, they would then default to the brand name indexes they were accustomed to using.

Today these indexes are receiving more scrutiny based on their pricing. Consultants need to truly understand that every decision matters and which benchmark they choose can make a huge difference in cost. They should be asking themselves the following questions:

  • Are my benchmarks truly reflective of the underlying components of that asset class? 
  • Are they trackable? 
  • Does the provider have a good track record and the ability to track the indexes it offers? 
  • Can I access the data?
  • Is it reliable?
  • What does it cost?

As the index world changes, pension funds and asset owners are going to demand more from their consultants when they walk in the door with their recommendations.

A More Informed Industry

The movement to reduce costs is a big change for the indexing industry and one that will likely accelerate over time. The entire industry —ETF providers, asset owners, pension consultants — is becoming more aware of the costs associated with various indexes and is more willing to look at alternatives to reduce these costs. As more investors become aware of the fees they are paying, the pressure will mount.

Not everyone in the indexing industry is going to be able to keep up. We are already beginning to see consolidation and in the next five to ten years the field will likely be further reduced, with only six or seven large indexers and a few niche players remaining in the game.  The mid-size indexers will more than likely disappear due to the effects of price competition. In the end, the main beneficiary from this competition will be the investor since these cost savings are passed on in the form of lower fees and expense ratios.


1Source: ETFGI

Nasdaq® and Nasdaq® are registered trademarks of The Nasdaq Group, Inc. The information contained above is provided for informational and educational purposes only, and nothing contained herein should be construed as investment advice, either on behalf of a particular security or an overall investment strategy. Neither The Nasdaq Group, Inc. nor any of its affiliates makes any recommendation to buy or sell any security or any representation about the financial condition of any company. Statements regarding Nasdaq-listed companies or Nasdaq proprietary indexes are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investors should undertake their own due diligence and carefully evaluate companies before investing. ADVICE FROM A SECURITIES PROFESSIONAL IS STRONGLY ADVISED.

© 2015. The Nasdaq Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.